ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2021
The experience of provided information and care during pregnancy and postpartum when diagnosed with preeclampsia: A qualitative study.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypertension Experiences Affecting Recovery from Delivery (HEARD): a mixed-methods interview study of postpartum people affected by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk Perception for Developing Cardiometabolic Disease Among Women Diagnosed with Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Postpartum follow-up of women with preeclampsia: facilitators and barriers - A qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Understanding Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge on Perinatal Depression among Women in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Women´s experiences of preeclampsia as a condition of uncertainty: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite preeclampsia being one of the most severe obstetrical complications there is only scant research describing women's experiences of preeclampsia. The aim of this study was to explore women's experience during pregnancy and the postpartum period regarding the provided information and care concerning preeclampsia.
methodsA qualitative study was designed. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were performed with fifteen women who were diagnosed with preeclampsia and included at two maternity units located in southern Sweden. The material was analyzed using content analysis.
resultsSuffering from preeclampsia was understood as being stressful, illustrated in four themes: fragmented information, lack of care planning, separation postpartum, and overall stress and worry.
conclusionsThe women experienced fragmented obstetrical care and information deficits when diagnosed with preeclampsia. Our findings indicate a need for additional support and professional guidance due to increased stress, worry, and despair of being separated from the newborn. Future research investigating specific care-planning and postpartum follow-up are suggested as steps to improve care for women with a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.