Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568741›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice2022

Training with an auditory perceptual learning game transfers to speech in competition.

E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, Mark A Philipp, Trevor Stavropoulos, Audrey Anna Carrillo, Sierra Cheung, Tess K Koerner, Michelle R Molis, Frederick J Gallun, Aaron R Seitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-ManceraPsychology Department, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.
Mark A PhilippBrain Game Center, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.
Trevor StavropoulosBrain Game Center, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.
Audrey Anna CarrilloBrain Game Center, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.
Sierra CheungBrain Game Center, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.
Tess K KoernerOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA.
Michelle R MolisOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA.
Frederick J GallunOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA.
Aaron R SeitzPsychology Department, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.

Funding

Brain Training For Central Auditory Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain InjuryR03HD094234 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI GALLUN, FREDERICK J., SEITZ, AARON R · 2017 to 2018
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD094234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding speech in the presence of acoustical competition is a major complaint of those with hearing difficulties. Here, a novel perceptual learning game was tested for its effectiveness in reducing difficulties with hearing speech in competition. The game was designed to train a mixture of auditory processing skills thought to underlie speech in competition, such as spectral-temporal processing, sound localization, and auditory working memory. Training on these skills occurred both in quiet and in competition with noise. Thirty college-aged participants without any known hearing difficulties were assigned either to this mixed-training condition or an active control consisting of frequency discrimination training within the same gamified setting. To assess training effectiveness, tests of speech in competition (primary outcome), as well as basic supra-threshold auditory processing and cognitive processing abilities (secondary outcomes) were administered before and after training. Results suggest modest improvements on speech in competition tests in the mixed-training compared to the frequency-discrimination control condition (Cohen's Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-021-00224-5.

Indexed as

Auditory trainingCognitive trainingPerceptual learningSupra-threshold auditory functionVideo-games

Identifiers

PMID34568741
PMCPMC8453468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.