Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568682›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

The Role of Drilled Formation in Filter Cake Properties Utilizing Different Weighting Materials.

Jaber Al Jaber, Badr S Bageri, Hany Gamal, Salaheldin Elkatatny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaber Al JaberCollege of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Badr S BageriCollege of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Hany GamalCollege of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2133-1266
Salaheldin ElkatatnyCollege of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-3715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The filter cake formed during a filtration process plays a vital role in the success of a drilling operation. There are several factors affecting the filter cake build-up such as drilled formation, drilling fluid properties, and well pressure and temperature. The collective impact of these two factors (i.e., formation and the drilling fluid) on the filter cake build-up needs to be fully investigated. In this study, two types of formations represented as limestone and sandstone were used with different weighting materials to assess and compare their impact on the filter cake properties, filtration behavior, and solid invasion. The used weighting materials are manganese tetroxide, ilmenite, barite, and hematite. The filter cake was formed under a temperature of 200 °F and differential pressure of 300 psi. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was employed to explore the pore structure of the used core samples. The results showed that the properties (i.e., shape and dimensions) of the different weighting materials are the dominant factors compared to the formation characteristics in most of the investigated filter cake properties. Nevertheless, the formation properties, namely, the permeability and pore structure, have a somehow higher contribution when it comes to the filter cake porosity and thickness. For solid invasion, there were no clear results about the main factor contributing to this issue.

Identifiers

PMID34568682
PMCPMC8459423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.