ArticleACS omega2021
Active Semisupervised Model for Improving the Identification of Anticancer Peptides.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational discovery of natural medicines targeting adenosine receptors for metabolic diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Deep active learning with high structural discriminability for molecular mutagenicity prediction.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation and analysis of DNA N4-methylcytosine methylation sites using deep learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- MILNP: Plant lncRNA-miRNA Interaction Prediction Based on Improved Linear Neighborhood Similarity and Label Propagation.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most dangerous threats to human health. Accurate identification of anticancer peptides (ACPs) is valuable for the development and design of new anticancer agents. However, most machine-learning algorithms have limited ability to identify ACPs, and their accuracy is sensitive to the amount of label data. In this paper, we construct a new technology that combines active learning (AL) and label propagation (LP) algorithm to solve this problem, called (ACP-ALPM). First, we develop an efficient feature representation method based on various descriptor information and coding information of the peptide sequence. Then, an AL strategy is used to filter out the most informative data for model training, and a more powerful LP classifier is cast through continuous iterations. Finally, we evaluate the performance of ACP-ALPM and compare it with that of some of the state-of-the-art and classic methods; experimental results show that our method is significantly superior to them. In addition, through the experimental comparison of random selection and AL on three public data sets, it is proved that the AL strategy is more effective. Notably, a visualization experiment further verified that AL can utilize unlabeled data to improve the performance of the model. We hope that our method can be extended to other types of peptides and provide more inspiration for other similar work.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.