Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568525›Full record

ArticleData in brief2021

Data on European kitchen layouts belonging to vulnerable consumers (elderly people and young families with children or pregnant women) and risk-takers (young single men).

Octavian Augustin Mihalache, Trond Møretrø, Daniela Borda, Loredana Dumitraşcu, Corina Neagu, Christophe Nguyen-The, Isabelle Maître, Pierrine Didier, Paula Teixeira, Luis Orlando Lopes Junqueira and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Octavian Augustin MihalacheDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, Galati 800201, Romania.
Trond MøretrøFisheries and Aquaculture Research, Nofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Osloveien 1, Ås N-1430, Norway.
Daniela BordaDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, Galati 800201, Romania.
Loredana DumitraşcuDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, Galati 800201, Romania.
Corina NeaguDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, Galati 800201, Romania.
Christophe Nguyen-TheINRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, Avignon 84000, France.
Isabelle MaîtreUSC1422 GRAPPE, Ecole Supérieure d'Agricultures (ESA), INRAE, SFR 4207 QUASAV, 55 rue Rabelais, BP 30748, Angers 49007 CEDEX, France.
Pierrine DidierINRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, Avignon 84000, France.
Paula TeixeiraCBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, Porto 4169-005, Portugal.
Luis Orlando Lopes JunqueiraInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Aníbal de Bettencourt 9, Lisboa 1600-189, Portugal.
Monica TruningerInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Aníbal de Bettencourt 9, Lisboa 1600-189, Portugal.
Tekla IzsóNational Food Chain Safety Office, Keleti Károly u. 24, Budapest H-1024, Hungary.
Gyula KaszaNational Food Chain Safety Office, Keleti Károly u. 24, Budapest H-1024, Hungary.
Silje Elisabeth SkulandConsumption Research Norway (SIFO) and Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig LangsrudFisheries and Aquaculture Research, Nofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Osloveien 1, Ås N-1430, Norway.
Anca Ioana NicolauDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, Galati 800201, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The data presented here capture the structure of kitchen layouts belonging to consumers vulnerable to foodborne diseases and food risk-takers. Data were collected in the frame of the SafeConsume project by multidisciplinary research teams that visited consumers during preparing a meal and had the possibility to examine their cooking routines. Distances between sink and stove, sink and refrigerator, stove and refrigerator, sink and working place (countertop or table), stove and working place were analyzed to correlate food safety practices applied during cooking with kitchen arrangements. The results arising from analyzing the ergonomics of kitchens versus potential cross-contamination events are presented in Mihalache et al., [1]. These data contribute to a better understanding of real kitchen layouts and can be used as a starting point for future research regarding food safety-oriented arrangements instead of ergonomics-focused designs, for food safety risk assessments, as study cases for explaining specific measures that can be established to improve food handling and hygiene practices in homes and for sociological research pointing consumers' behavior during cooking.

Indexed as

BalconyCountertopRefrigeratorSafety triangleSinkStoveTableWork triangle

Identifiers

PMID34568525
PMCPMC8449187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.