Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568504›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

A Prediction Model for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Using Artificial Intelligence.

Iskandar Tamimi, Joaquin Ballesteros, Almudena Perez Lara, Jimmy Tat, Motaz Alaqueel, Justin Schupbach, Yousef Marwan, Cristina Urdiales, Jesus Manuel Gomez-de-Gabriel, Mark Burman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Machine learning model identifies tibial anatomical variables as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Iskandar TamimiKnee Division, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Joaquin BallesterosITIS Software, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Almudena Perez LaraDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Jimmy TatDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Motaz AlaqueelDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Justin SchupbachDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Yousef MarwanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Cristina UrdialesElectronics Technology Department, Escuela de Ingeniería Telecomunicación, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
Jesus Manuel Gomez-de-GabrielRobotics and Mechatronics Group, Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
Mark BurmanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Paul Andre MartineauDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupervised machine learning models in artificial intelligence (AI) have been increasingly used to predict different types of events. However, their use in orthopaedic surgery has been limited. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that supervised learning techniques could be used to build a mathematical model to predict primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries using a set of morphological features of the knee. STUDY

designCross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsIncluded were 50 adults who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction between 2008 and 2015. All patients were between 18 and 40 years of age at the time of surgery. Patients with a previous ACL injury, multiligament knee injury, previous ACL reconstruction, history of ACL revision surgery, complete meniscectomy, infection, missing data, and associated fracture were excluded. We also identified 50 sex-matched controls who had not sustained an ACL injury. For all participants, we used the preoperative magnetic resonance images to measure the anteroposterior lengths of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus as well as the lateral and medial bone slope (LBS and MBS), lateral and medial meniscal height (LMH and MMH), and lateral and medial meniscal slope (LMS and MMS). The AI predictor was created using Matlab R2019b. A Gaussian naïve Bayes model was selected to create the predictor.

resultsPatients in the ACL injury group had a significantly increased posterior LBS (7.0° ± 4.7° vs 3.9° ± 5.4°;

conclusionA prediction model for primary ACL injury, created using machine learning techniques, achieved a >90% testing accuracy. Compared with patients who did not sustain an ACL injury, patients with torn ACLs had an increased posterior LBS and LMS and a lower MMH and LMH.

Indexed as

ACLanterior cruciate ligamentanteroposterior lengthsartificial intelligencebone slopeinjurymachine learningmeniscal heightmeniscal slopepredictionrisk

Identifiers

PMID34568504
PMCPMC8461131
OpenAlexW3199347245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.