Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568486›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Diagnostic Performance and Appropriate Cut-Offs of Different Anthropometric Indicators for Detecting Children with Overweight and Obesity.

Muhammad Asif, Muhammad Aslam, Kalim Ullah, Muhammad Qasim, Khurram Afzal, Asad Abbas, Manzar Ali, Muhammad Younis, Sami Ullah, Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin Asad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad AsifDepartment of Statistics, Government Degree College, Qadir Pur Raan, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-7755
Muhammad AslamDepartment of Statistics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Kalim UllahDepartment of Zoology, Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST), Kohat, Pakistan.
Muhammad QasimDepartment of Economics, Finance and Statistics, Jonkoping University, Sweden.
Khurram AfzalInstitute of Food Science & Nutrition, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Asad AbbasInstitute of Food Science & Nutrition, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Manzar AliMultan Medical & Dental College, Ibne Siena Hospital & Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad YounisInstitute of Food Science & Nutrition, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Sami UllahDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin AsadDepartment of Pharmacy, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Abbotabad Campus, 22060, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-9416
Justyna WyszyńskaMedical College of Rzeszów University, ul. Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the clinical settings, different anthropometric indicators like neck circumference (NC), waist circumference (WC), midupper arm circumference (MUAC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and arm-to-height ratio (AHtR) have been suggested for evaluating overweight and obesity in children. The comparative ability of these indicators in Pakistan is yet unknown. This study is aimed at examining the validity of different anthropometric indicators of overweight and obesity simultaneously and at determining their superlative cut-off values that would correctly detect overweight and obesity in children. For this purpose, the dataset of anthropometric measurements height, weight, WC, MUAC, and NC of 5,964 Pakistani children, aged 5-12 years collected in a cross-sectional multiethnic anthropometric survey (MEAS), was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the validity of different anthropometric indicators. The most sensitive and specific cut-off points, positive and negative predictive values of each indicator were also calculated. The results of the ROC curve indicated that all the studied indicators had a good performance but the indicators AHtR and WHtR had the highest value of the area under the curve (AUC) for the screening of children with overweight and obesity (AUC > 0.80). In the overall sample, AHtR, WHtR, MUAC, WC, and NC cut-off points indicative of overweight, in both boys and girls, were 0.14, 0.46, 18.41 cm, 62.86 cm, and 26.36 cm and 0.14, 0.47, 18.16 cm, 64.39 cm, and 26.54 cm, respectively; the corresponding values for obesity were 0.14, 0.47, 18.67 cm, 62.10 cm, and 26.36 cm and 0.14, 0.48, 20.19 cm, 64.39 cm, and 25.27 cm. We concluded that the sex-specific cut-off points for AHtR, WHtR, MUAC, WC, and NC can be used to diagnose overweight and obesity in Pakistani children.

Indexed as

AnthropometryAdolescentArea Under CurveChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesityROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID34568486
PMCPMC8457951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.