Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568470›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Tubectomy of Pregnant and Non-pregnant Female Balinese Macaques (

Stefan Deleuze, Fany Brotcorne, Roland Polet, Gede Soma, Goulven Rigaux, Gwennan Giraud, Fanny Cloutier, Pascal Poncin, Nengah Wandia, Marie-Claude Huynen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-Tailed Macaque (Biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefan DeleuzeResearch Unit FARAH, Equine and Companion Animal Reproduction Pathologies Clinic, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Fany BrotcorneResearch Unit SPHERES, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Sciences Faculty, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Roland PoletResearch Unit SPHERES, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Sciences Faculty, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Gede SomaPrimate Research Center, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Goulven RigauxPan Anima, Tournai, Belgium.
Gwennan GiraudResearch Unit SPHERES, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Sciences Faculty, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Fanny CloutierResearch Unit SPHERES, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Sciences Faculty, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pascal PoncinResearch Unit FOCUS, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Nengah WandiaPrimate Research Center, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Marie-Claude HuynenResearch Unit SPHERES, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Sciences Faculty, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, primates, and humans increasingly share habitats and often enter in conflict when primates thrive in human-dominated environments, calling for special management measures. Reproductive control is increasingly used to manage population growth but very few monitoring data are available. Therefore, the efficiency and implications of such programs require a careful examination. In the context of a contraception program in wild female long-tailed macaques in Ubud, Bali, conducted over four successive campaigns between 2017 and 2019, including 140 females (i.e., 41.9% of the reproductive females of the population in 2019), modifications of an endoscopic tubectomy procedure, a permanent sterilization method, clinical evaluation of this method, and the post-operative monitoring results of the neutered females after release are described. This surgical approach was applicable for pregnant females: 28.6% of the treated females were pregnant at the time of the surgery. The procedure used a single lateral port to reach and cauterize both oviducts in non-pregnant as well as in early to mid-term pregnant females. Pregnant females nearer to term required a second lateral port to access both oviducts masked by the size of the gravid uterus. Moreover, bipolar thermocauterization was utilized successfully without resection to realize the tubectomy. The average duration of the laparoscopic surgery was 14 min for non-pregnant females and 22 min for pregnant females. Animals were released 3 h 22 min in average following their capture. This short holding time, recommended for free-ranging primates, was made possible by the minimal invasiveness of the sterilization approach. A laparoscopic post-operative evaluation conducted on two patients during the following campaign confirmed that the oviducts were definitely disrupted and no longer patent. Moreover, no new pregnancies in sterilized females were recorded during the 3-year observation period. The survival rate of the treated females 6 months after sterilization was high (96.3%) with no major post-operative complications clinically recorded. Among females that were pregnant during surgery, 81.1% were confirmed to experience term delivery. This study demonstrates the safety and efficiency of endoscopic tubectomy, even for pregnant females, as a mean of wild macaques' population control.

Indexed as

bipolar thermocauterylaparoscopymonkeypopulation controlsalpingectomysterilizationwildlife

Identifiers

PMID34568470
PMCPMC8458650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.