Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568105›Full record

ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2021

Dreaming during the COVID-19 lockdown: a comparison of Italian adolescents and adults.

Massimiliano Sommantico, Ilaria Iorio, Marina Lacatena, Santa Parrello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dreaming during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  6. Introduction to the Special Section onResearch in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Massimiliano SommanticoDynamic Psychology Laboratory, Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II.
Ilaria IorioDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Marina LacatenaDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Santa ParrelloDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the continuity hypothesis of dreaming, we have studied the effects of lockdown measures on Italian adolescents' and adults' dreams during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A sample of 475 subjects (73.9% women; 48.4% adolescents; ages 12-70 years, M=25.10, SD=12.2) was recruited via the Internet between April 17, 2020 and May 18, 2020. Participants were asked to provide socio-demographic data, as well as to report their Most Recent Dream. Results indicated that adults' dreams were the longest, as well as characterized by higher emotional intensity, predominantly negative emotions, and a higher presence of sensory impressions. Furthermore, results indicated that the participants, especially adolescents, who were most directly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic reported the strongest effects on their dreams. Results also indicated that women recall dreams more often than men, in addition to reporting higher emotional intensity, predominantly negative emotions, and a higher presence of sensory impressions. Finally, results of the Thematic Analysis of Elementary Contexts showed that adults' dreams seem to be centered, above all, on both pleasant memories linked to experiences that are now forbidden (

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicDreamslockdownnightmarestraumatic events

Identifiers

PMID34568105
PMCPMC8451218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.