Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568050›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

A Multicentric Randomized Trial to Evaluate the ROle of Uterine MANipulator on Laparoscopic/Robotic HYsterectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: The ROMANHY Trial.

Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Emanuele Perrone, Camilla Fedele, Stefano Cianci, Tina Pasciuto, Vito Chiantera, Stefano Uccella, Alfredo Ercoli, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Anna Fagotti and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Manipulator-Free Versus Manipulator-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Are Outcomes Comparable in Experienced Hands?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Application and evaluation of minimally invasive surgical treatment options for early endometrial cancer.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore Gueli AllettiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele PerroneDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Camilla FedeleInstitute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Stefano CianciDepartment of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Barresi," Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Tina PasciutoSTAR Center (Statistics Technology Archiving Research), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Vito ChianteraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Stefano UccellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, Università di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alfredo ErcoliDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università degli studi di Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe VizzielliDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna FagottiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Valerio GallottaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CosentinoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli-Molise, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Barbara CostantiniDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Stefano RestainoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, University-Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Giorgia MonterossiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea RosatiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luigi Carlo TurcoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Vito Andrea CapozziDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesco FanfaniDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Parma · ITUniversity of Udine · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis prospective randomized trial aimed to assess the impact of the uterine manipulator in terms of lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for early-stage endometrial cancer.

methodsIn this multicentric randomized trial, enrolled patients were randomly allocated in two groups according to the no use (arm A) or the use (arm B) of the uterine manipulator. Inclusion criteria were G1-G2 early-stage endometrial cancer at preoperative evaluation. The variables collected included baseline demographic characteristics, perioperative data, final pathology report, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up.

resultsIn the study, 154 patients (76 in arm A and 78 in arm B) were finally included. No significant differences were recorded regarding the baseline characteristics. A statistically significant difference was found in operative time for the laparoscopic staging (p=0.005), while no differences were reported for the robotic procedures (p=0.419). The estimated blood loss was significantly lower in arm A (p=0.030). No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two study groups in terms of peritoneal cytology, LVSI (p=0.501), and pattern of LVSI (p=0.790). No differences were detected in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival (p=0.996 and p=0.480, respectively). Similarly, no differences were recorded in the number of recurrences, 6 (7.9%) in arm A and 4 (5.2%) in arm B (p=0.486). The use of the uterine manipulator had no impact on DFS both at univariable and multivariable analyses.

conclusionsThe intrauterine manipulator does not affect the LVSI in early-stage endometrial cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic/robotic staging. CLINICAL

trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT: 02762214).

Indexed as

endometrial cancerhysterectomylaparoscopic hysterectomyminimally invasive hysterectomyrobotic hysterectomyuterine manipulator

Identifiers

PMID34568050
PMCPMC8461311
OpenAlexW3201085112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.