Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567849›Full record

ArticleExpert opinion on orphan drugs2017

Clinical trials evaluating potential therapies for light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

Eli Muchtar, Morie A Gertz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert opinion on orphan drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eli MuchtarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Morie A GertzDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Phase 3 stem cell transplant for light chain amyloidosisR01CA111345 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GERTZ, MORIE ABRAHAM · 2005 to 2011
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe field of systemic amyloidosis is experiencing major advances in diagnostic and prognostic methods coupled with a growing availability in treatment options. AREAS COVERED: Treatment of AL amyloidosis traditionally targeted the clonal plasma cells, in order to block further production of amyloidogenic light chains. Currently, a research focus is placed on targeting the already formed amyloid deposits using monoclonal antibodies against epitopes on such deposits. Encouraging results were obtained from the three investigated antibodies: NEOD001, 11-1F4 and anti-SAP, but further validation is required before these antibodies can be commercialized. In this paper, we review the current active clinical research in AL amyloidosis, which includes the monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid deposits, daratumumab, Venetoclax, doxycycline, green tea, pomalidomide, carfilzomib and ixazomib. EXPERT OPINION: Monoclonal antibodies, targeting either the amyloid deposits or the plasma cell compartment will likely be integrated into routine treatment practice given their encouraging results and minimal toxicity in the fragile population of AL amyloidosis. Other therapeutic options hold promise to the field as well, but toxicity will likely challenge their routine use. Early recognition remains the best option for outcome enhancement.

Indexed as

amyloidclinical-trialsMonoclonal antibodyresearch

Identifiers

PMID34567849
PMCPMC8460071
OpenAlexW2623561934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.