Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567686›Full record

ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2020

Microtechnology-based methods for organoid models.

Vanessa Velasco, S Ali Shariati, Rahim Esfandyarpour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vanessa VelascoBiochemistry Department, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
S Ali ShariatiDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, Institute for the Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA USA.
Rahim EsfandyarpourDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA USA.

Funding

Determining feedback mechanisms between cell cycle and cell fate in pluripotent cellsR00GM126027 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SHARIATI, ALI · 2020 to 2022
$747k
Nanoneedle microrobots for single cancer cell manipulation and genome editingR21CA212731 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, RONALD WAYNE · 2017 to 2018
$628k
Determining feedback mechanisms between cell cycle and cell fate in pluripotent cellsK99GM126027 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHARIATI, ALI · 2018 to 2019
$109k
Determining feedback mechanisms linking cell cycle control and stem cell pluripotency using an engineered CRISPR/dCas9 systemF32GM123576 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHARIATI, ALI · 2017 to 2017
$59k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA212731NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM123576NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM126027NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM126027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovations in biomaterials and stem cell technology have allowed for the emergence of novel three-dimensional (3D) tissue-like structures known as organoids and spheroids. As a result, compared to conventional 2D cell culture and animal models, these complex 3D structures have improved the accuracy and facilitated in vitro investigations of human diseases, human development, and personalized medical treatment. Due to the rapid progress of this field, numerous spheroid and organoid production methodologies have been published. However, many of the current spheroid and organoid production techniques are limited by complexity, throughput, and reproducibility. Microfabricated and microscale platforms (e.g., microfluidics and microprinting) have shown promise to address some of the current limitations in both organoid and spheroid generation. Microfabricated and microfluidic devices have been shown to improve nutrient delivery and exchange and have allowed for the arrayed production of size-controlled culture areas that yield more uniform organoids and spheroids for a higher throughput at a lower cost. In this review, we discuss the most recent production methods, challenges currently faced in organoid and spheroid production, and microfabricated and microfluidic applications for improving spheroid and organoid generation. Specifically, we focus on how microfabrication methods and devices such as lithography, microcontact printing, and microfluidic delivery systems can advance organoid and spheroid applications in medicine.

Indexed as

BionanoelectronicsElectrical and electronic engineering

Identifiers

PMID34567686
PMCPMC8433138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.