Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567652›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2020

Investigation of cell mechanics using single-beam acoustic tweezers as a versatile tool for the diagnosis and treatment of highly invasive breast cancer cell lines: an in vitro study.

Hae Gyun Lim, Hsiao-Chuan Liu, Chi Woo Yoon, Hayong Jung, Min Gon Kim, Changhan Yoon, Hyung Ham Kim, K Kirk Shung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Manipulation and Mechanical Deformation of Leukemia Cells by High-Frequency Ultrasound Single Beam.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hae Gyun LimDepartment of Creative IT Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 37673 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-7130
Hsiao-Chuan LiuNIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasonic Transducer Technology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5410-8821
Chi Woo YoonNIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasonic Transducer Technology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
Hayong JungNIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasonic Transducer Technology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
Min Gon KimNIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasonic Transducer Technology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
Changhan YoonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam 50834 Republic of Korea.
Hyung Ham KimDepartment of Creative IT Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 37673 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6353-5550
K Kirk ShungNIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasonic Transducer Technology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in diagnostic systems for metastatic cancer over the last few decades have played a significant role in providing patients with effective treatment by evaluating the characteristics of cancer cells. Despite the progress made in cancer prognosis, we still rely on the visual analysis of tissues or cells from histopathologists, where the subjectivity of traditional manual interpretation persists. This paper presents the development of a dual diagnosis and treatment tool using an in vitro acoustic tweezers platform with a 50 MHz ultrasonic transducer for label-free trapping and bursting of human breast cancer cells. For cancer cell detection and classification, the mechanical properties of a single cancer cell were quantified by single-beam acoustic tweezers (SBAT), a noncontact assessment tool using a focused acoustic beam. Cell-mimicking phantoms and agarose hydrogel spheres (AHSs) served to standardize the biomechanical characteristics of the cells. Based on the analytical comparison of deformability levels between the cells and the AHSs, the mechanical properties of the cells could be indirectly measured by interpolating the Young's moduli of the AHSs. As a result, the calculated Young's moduli, i.e., 1.527 kPa for MDA-MB-231 (highly invasive breast cancer cells), 2.650 kPa for MCF-7 (weakly invasive breast cancer cells), and 2.772 kPa for SKBR-3 (weakly invasive breast cancer cells), indicate that highly invasive cancer cells exhibited a lower Young's moduli than weakly invasive cells, which indicates a higher deformability of highly invasive cancer cells, leading to a higher metastasis rate. Single-cell treatment may also be carried out by bursting a highly invasive cell with high-intensity, focused ultrasound.

Indexed as

EngineeringMaterials science

Identifiers

PMID34567652
PMCPMC8433385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.