Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567550›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021

Risk perception, attitude, and practice related to COVID-19: A cross-sectional study among 1085 Iranian healthcare workers.

Romina Roshanshad, Amirhossein Roshanshad, Hossein Molavi Vardanjani, Amirali Mashhadiagha, Maryam Mobarakabadi, Armin Hoveidaei, Amir Human Hoveidaei

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19 Exposure, Protective Measures, Symptom Assessment, and Risk Perception Among Healthcare Workers in Peru: A Longitudinal Cohort Study (2020-2021).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romina RoshanshadStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amirhossein RoshanshadStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hossein Molavi VardanjaniMPH Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amirali MashhadiaghaStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam MobarakabadiNeurophysiology Lab, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Armin HoveidaeiStudent Research Committee, School of Allied Medical Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Human HoveidaeiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRHamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsHealthcare workers are at risk of mental illness during COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the level of perceived risk and adherence to preventive behaviors regarding COVID-19 among medical students and physicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted an online nationwide cross-sectional survey among Iranian physicians and medical students. We collected data regarding perceived risk, perceived stress scale (P·S·S.), attitude, practice, and information sources. We assessed the association of four main outcomes (risk perception, P·S.S. score, attitude, and practice) with demographic variables.

resultsA total of 1085 participants with an overall fear score of 6.48 ± 2.29 out of 10 filled the questionnaires. Older and more educated participants had a higher risk perception level and adherence to protective measures. In contrary, participants in lower-risk workplaces had lower risk perception scores. Main sources of information did not affect the scores of risk perception, P·S·S., and practice. Higher risk perception scores were observed in those with higher practice and P·S.S. scores.Contrary to risk perception, the P·S.S. score was not affected by many of the demographic variables, except gender. The most positive attitude was observed in individuals with a higher level of trust in governmental information sources. Participants with higher P·S.S. scores adhered more to protective measures.

conclusionRisk perception had the greatest impact on adherence to preventive behaviors. Therefore, policymakers should consider perceived risk as a predictor of the extension of the pandemic. Both risk perception and P·S.S. reflect the severity of fear from COVID-19; however, P·S.S. is less affected by sociodemographic and workplace characteristics.

Indexed as

AttitudeHealthcare workersHealth policyPerceived stress scalePracticeRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID34567550
PMCPMC8450226
OpenAlexW3200429296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.