ArticleF1000Research2020
TAPAS: Towards Automated Processing and Analysis of multi-dimensional bioimage data.
Article in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the multichannel gap through computational reconstruction of interaction in super-resolution microscopy.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Multiphoton intravital microscopy of rodents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern microscopy is based on reproducible quantitative analysis, image data should be batch-processed by a standardized system that can be shared and easily reused by others. Furthermore, such system should require none or minimal programming from the users. We developed TAPAS (Towards an Automated Processing and Analysis System). The goal is to design an easy system for describing and exchanging processing workflows. The protocols are simple text files comprising a linear list of commands used to process and analyse the images. An extensive set of 60 modules is already available, mostly based on the tools proposed in the 3D ImageJ Suite. We propose a wizard, called TAPAS menu, to help the user design the protocol by listing the available modules and the parameters associated. Most modules will have default parameters values for most common tasks. Once the user has designed the protocol, he/she can apply the protocol to a set of images, that can be either stored locally or on a OMERO database. An extensive documentation including the list of modules, various tutorials and link to the source code is available at https://imagej.net/TAPAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.