ArticleChemical science2021
Degradation and regeneration of Fe-N
Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the ORR durability of single atomic Fe-NNature communications · 2025Article
- Sequential oxygen evolution and decoupled water splitting via electrochemical redox reaction of nickel hydroxides.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Real-time investigation of reactive oxygen species and radicals evolved from operating Fe-N-C electrocatalysts during the ORR: potential dependence, impact on degradation, and structural comparisons.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Rational Design of Atomically Dispersed Metal Site Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Bioinspired and Bioderived Aqueous Electrocatalysis.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Adsorption of heavy metal onto biomass-derived activated carbon: review.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Iron atom-cluster interactions increase activity and improve durability in Fe-N-C fuel cells.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The severe degradation of Fe-N-C electrocatalysts during a long-term oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has become a major obstacle for application in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Understanding the degradation mechanism and regeneration of aged Fe-N-C catalysts would be of particular interest for extending their service life. Herein, we show that the by-product hydrogen peroxide during the ORR not only results in the oxidation of the carbon surface but also causes the demetallation of Fe active sites. Quantitative analysis reveals that the Fe demetallation constitutes the main reason for catalyst degradation, while previously reported carbon surface oxidation plays a minor role. We further reveal that post thermal annealing of the aged catalysts can transform the oxygen functional groups on the carbon surface into micropores. These newly formed micropores not only help to increase the active-site density but also the intrinsic ORR activity of the neighbouring Fe-N
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.