ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
The Application of the Big Data Medical Imaging System in Improving the Medical and Health Examination.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the application effect of the big data medical imaging tertiary diagnostic system in improving the medical and health examination, cases in township health centers were collected by the medical imaging tertiary diagnosis system. Clinical cases examined by the tertiary diagnostic system of big data medical imaging will be set as the observation group. Clinical cases not involved in the tertiary diagnostic system of big data medical imaging were set as the control group. The qualified rate, film positive rate, and film diagnosis accuracy between the two groups are compared, and X-ray perspective, X-ray examination, and CT multiple medical imaging examinations are used in two groups. The experimental results showed that the pass rate was 86.57%, positive rate was 72.32%, and diagnosis rate was 80.17%. Pass rate, positive rate, and diagnostic accuracy were higher than the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.