Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567390›Full record

ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2021

Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Does Age Matter?

Maria Eugenia Briseño-Godínez, Antonio Arauz, Juan Carlos López-Hernández, Adib Jorge de Saráchaga, Esther Y Pérez-Valdez, Raúl Nathanael May-Más, Gabriela López-Hernández, Lisette Bazán-Rodriguez, Javier Andrés Galnares-Olalde, Elizabeth León-Manríquez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Eugenia Briseño-GodínezNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Antonio ArauzNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Carlos López-HernándezNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Adib Jorge de SaráchagaNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Esther Y Pérez-ValdezNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Raúl Nathanael May-MásNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Gabriela López-HernándezGeriatrics Department, Regional General Hospital 251, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Metepec, Mexico.
Lisette Bazán-RodriguezNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Javier Andrés Galnares-OlaldeNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-6221
Elizabeth León-ManríquezNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.
Edwin Steven Vargas-CañasNeuromuscular Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez," Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwenty to 40% of Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS) patients will not be able to walk independently despite effective treatment. Older patients carry additional risks for worse outcomes.

methodsA single center, ambispective cohort study was performed. Only subjects ≥18 years with a 3-month follow-up were included. Elderly patients were considered as a whole if ≥ 60 years. Demographics, CSF and nerve conduction studies were compared. A binomial logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were carried out to estimate good prognosis (Hugues ≤2) at 3-month follow-up.

resultsFrom 130 patients recruited, 27.6% were elderly adults. They had a more severe disease, higher mEGOS and more cranial nerve involvement. Age ≥70 years, invasive mechanical ventilation and axonal subtype, portrayed an unfavorable 3-month outcome. Further analysis demonstrated an earlier recovery in independent walk at 3 months for patients <70 years.

conclusionsElderly patients with GBS have a more severe disease at admission and encounter worse prognosis at 3-month follow-up, especially those above 70 years.

Indexed as

elderly adultGuillain-Barre syndromeoutcome

Identifiers

PMID34567390
PMCPMC8442146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.