Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567370›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2021

The Effect of Set Configuration and Load on Post-Activation Potentiation on Vertical Jump in Athletes.

Paolo Sirieiro, Igor Nasser, Ward C Dobbs, Jeffrey M Willardson, Humberto Miranda

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06779409 (Comparing the Effects of Post Activation Potentiation on Vertical Jump Using High-Intensity Back Squat vs. Wingate Bike Test in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06779409 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Effects of Post Activation Potentiation on Vertical Jump Using High-Intensity Back Squat vs. Wingate Bike Test in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center ShreveportRan2025 to 2025Enrolled35ConditionsPerformance Enhancement, Muscle ActivationArmsBack squat, Wingate test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo SirieiroSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL.
Igor NasserSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL.
Ward C DobbsDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Jeffrey M WillardsonHealth and Human Performance Department, Montana State University-Billings, Billings, MT, USA.
Humberto MirandaSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Wisconsin–La Crosse · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of post-activation potentiation (PAP) on countermovement jump (CMJ) using different set configurations and loads on conditioning activity (CA) in highly trained athletes. Sixteen national level swimmers participated in this study and performed a total of six visits to the laboratory. The first session was used for familiarization, the second session was utilized to determine five repetitions maximum (RM) in the half squat (HS), and the following four visits consisted of four CA protocols performed in a counterbalanced order. Two CAs were performed as traditional sets (TS) with sequential repetition, with different load, which involved one set of five repetitions at 100% (TS100) or 65% of 5 RM load (TS65). Additionally, two CAs included one set of five repetitions with intraset rests, 30 second inter-repetition rest (IRR), with both relative loads (IRR100 and IRR65). Countermovement jump height was measured at baseline, immediately after the CA, and every two-minutes until twelve-minutes. Significantly faster peak and mean barbell velocity was observed for the CAs with lower relative loads (

Indexed as

Fatigueperformanceteam sportyouth

Identifiers

PMID34567370
PMCPMC8439694
OpenAlexW3184811440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.