Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567305›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2021

Developing a dashboard for faculty development in competency-based training programs: a design-based research project.

Yusuf Yilmaz, Robert Carey, Teresa M Chan, Venkat Bandi, Shisong Wang, Robert A Woods, Debajyoti Mondal, Brent Thoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overcrowded curriculum is an impediment to change (Part A).Canadian medical education journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yusuf YilmazContinuing Professional Development Office and McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT) Program, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Robert CareyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Teresa M ChanContinuing Professional Development Office and McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT) Program, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Venkat BandiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Shisong WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Robert A WoodsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Debajyoti MondalDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brent ThomaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanadian specialist residency training programs are implementing a form of competency-based medical education (CBME) that requires frequent assessments of entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Faculty struggle to provide helpful feedback and assign appropriate entrustment scores. CBME faculty development initiatives rarely incorporate teaching metrics. Dashboards could be used to visualize faculty assessment data to support faculty development.

methodsUsing a design-based research process, we identified faculty development needs related to CBME assessments and designed a dashboard containing elements (data, analytics, and visualizations) meeting these needs. Data was collected within the emergency medicine residency program at the University of Saskatchewan through interviews with program leaders, faculty development experts, and faculty participating in development sessions. Two investigators thematically analyzed interview transcripts to identify faculty needs that were audited by a third investigator. The needs were described using representative quotes and the dashboard elements designed to address them.

resultsBetween July 1, 2019 and December 11, 2020 we conducted 15 interviews with nine participants (two program leaders, three faculty development experts, and four faculty members). Three needs emerged as themes from the analysis: analysis of assessments, contextualization of assessments, and accessible reporting. We addressed these needs by designing an accessible dashboard to present contextualized quantitative and narrative assessment data for each faculty member.

conclusionsWe identified faculty development needs related to EPA assessments and designed dashboard elements to meet them. The resulting dashboard was used for faculty development sessions. This work will inform the development of CBME assessment dashboards for faculty.

Identifiers

PMID34567305
PMCPMC8463237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.