Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567272›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Engineering and clinical use of artificial intelligence (AI) with machine learning and data science advancements: radiology leading the way for future.

B M Zeeshan Hameed, Gayathri Prerepa, Vathsala Patil, Pranav Shekhar, Syed Zahid Raza, Hadis Karimi, Rahul Paul, Nithesh Naik, Sachin Modi, Ganesh Vigneswaran and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. MLP-PSO Hybrid Algorithm for Heart Disease Prediction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

B M Zeeshan HameedDepartment of Urology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Gayathri PrerepaDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Vathsala PatilDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Pranav ShekharDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Syed Zahid RazaDepartment of Urology, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Hadis KarimiManipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Rahul PaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nithesh NaikInternational Training and Research in Uro-oncology and Endourology (iTRUE) Group, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-7697
Sachin ModiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Ganesh VigneswaranDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Bhavan Prasad RaiInternational Training and Research in Uro-oncology and Endourology (iTRUE) Group Manipal, India.
Piotr ChłostaDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Kraków, Poland.
Bhaskar K SomaniInternational Training and Research in Uro-oncology and Endourology (iTRUE) Group, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBFreeman Hospital · GBHarvard University · USJagiellonian University · PLMathrusri Ramabai Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, many clinical and engineering methods have been adapted for testing and screening for the presence of diseases. The most commonly used methods for diagnosis and analysis are computed tomography (CT) and X-ray imaging. Manual interpretation of these images is the current gold standard but can be subject to human error, is tedious, and is time-consuming. To improve efficiency and productivity, incorporating machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms could expedite the process. This article aims to review the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and its contribution to data science as well as various learning algorithms in radiology. We will analyze and explore the potential applications in image interpretation and radiological advances for AI. Furthermore, we will discuss the usage, methodology implemented, future of these concepts in radiology, and their limitations and challenges.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedata sciencedata science in radiologydeep learningmachine learningmachine learning in radiologyradiology

Identifiers

PMID34567272
PMCPMC8458681
OpenAlexW3201318612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.