ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021
Texture Analysis in the Assessment of Rectal Cancer: Comparison of T2WI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Predictive and Prognostic MRI-Based Biomarkers in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Diffusion-weighted imaging increases the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing rectal cancer T stage and reduces intra- and interobserver variability.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Texture analysis (TA) techniques derived from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of rectal cancer can both achieve good diagnosis performance. This study was to compare TA from T2WI and ADC maps between different pathological T and N stages to confirm which TA analysis is better in diagnosis performance. 146 patients were enrolled in this study. Tumor TA was performed on every patient's T2WI and ADC maps, respectively; then, skewness, kurtosis, uniformity, entropy, energy, inertia, and correlation were calculated. Our results demonstrated that those significant different parameters derived from T2WI had better diagnostic performance than those from ADC maps in differentiating pT3b-4 and pN1-2 stage tumors. In particular, the energy derived from T2WI was an optimal parameter for diagnostic efficiency. High-resolution T2WI plays a key point in the local stage of rectal cancer; thus, TA derived from T2WI may be a more useful tool to aid radiologists and surgeons in selecting treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.