Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567211›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Comparative Efficacy of Haizao Yuhu Decoction Composed of Different Varieties of

Feng Chen, Na Li, Linlin Xiu, Haiyan Liu, Shaohong Chen, Cheng He, Angran Fan, Xue Yu, Xin Wang, Chaoran Ge and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng ChenBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Na LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Linlin XiuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Haiyan LiuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Shaohong ChenBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Cheng HeBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Angran FanBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Xue YuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Xin WangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Chaoran GeBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Min HuoBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Jia HeBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Gansheng ZhongBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-4570
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In traditional Chinese medicine,

Identifiers

PMID34567211
PMCPMC8460382
OpenAlexW3200075346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.