Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567118›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2021

Comparisons of Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer between Chinese and International Practice: A Nationwide Multicenter Epidemiological Study from China.

Yi-Qun Han, Zong-Bi Yi, Pei Yu, Wen-Na Wang, Qu-Chang Ouyang, Min Yan, Xiao-Jia Wang, Xi-Chun Hu, Ze-Fei Jiang, Tao Huang and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03047889 (A Nation-wide Multicenter Clinical Epidemiologic Study of Chinese Females With Advanced Breast), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03047889 unknown statusnot on this map

A Nation-wide Multicenter Clinical Epidemiologic Study of Chinese Females With Advanced Breast

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2016 to 2017Enrolled4,200ConditionsAdvanced Breast CancerArmsstandard therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Yi-Qun HanDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-3058
Zong-Bi YiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Pei YuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wen-Na WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qu-Chang OuyangDepartment of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Min YanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiao-Jia WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xi-Chun HuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ze-Fei JiangDepartment of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tao HuangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhong-Sheng TongDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shu-Sen WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yong-Mei YinDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Province Tumor Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Run-Xiang YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Hua-Wei YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yue-E TengDepartments of Medical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Tao SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Liaoning Breast Cancer Research, Shenyang, China.
Li CaiThe 4th Department of Internal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-8926
Hong-Yuan LiDepartment of the Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xue-Nong OuyangDepartment of Medicine Oncology, Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Fuzhou, China.
Jian-Jun HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xin-Lan LiuDepartment of Oncology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Shun-E YangDepartment of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
You-Lin QiaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jin-Hu FanDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-7893
Jia-Yu WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5673-7640
Bing-He XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-2747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo better understand the status of medical treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and the differences between the Chinese and the international clinical practice.

methodsThis was a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter, epidemiological study of advanced breast cancer patients from China. Between January 01, 2012, and December 31, 2014, a total of 3649 patients, covering 7 geographic regions and 21 institutions, participated in this series of studies. HER2-positive breast cancer was selected among the group and adopted into this study. In comparison, we summarized the demographics and clinical characteristics of HER2-positive breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

resultsA total of 918 patients diagnosed as HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 46 years (ranging, 23 to 78) with a single-peak incidence. The proportions of stages II-IV at diagnosis and distance metastasis in viscera were more than half of the participants. In comparison, the prevalence of estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive expression and luminalB subtype was relatively lower than that of the United States. The receipt of chemotherapy was fairly higher, while the usage of targeted therapy was seriously insufficient. Tumor size was in significantly positive associations with the duration of targeted therapy (Kendall's correlation coefficient = 0.3,

conclusionOur study suggested that HER2-positive breast cancer patients were characterized as a younger trend, a lower prevalence of hormonal receptor (HR)-positive expression, and less accessible to anti-HER2 targeted therapy with insufficient duration over the past few years in China. Concerted efforts should be exerted for promising survival benefits in the future. The trial registration number is https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03047889.

Identifiers

PMID34567118
PMCPMC8457988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.