ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021
Integrated Genomic Analyses From Low-Depth Sequencing Help Resolve Phylogenetic Incongruence in the Bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae).
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological and molecular evidence clarifies the taxonomic position of Indosasa solearis and reveals the hybrid origin of Sinobambusa (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Arundinarieae).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genomics reveal population structure, genetic diversity and evolutionary history ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- A nuclear phylogenomic tree of grasses (Poaceae) recovers current classification despite gene tree incongruence.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Genome assemblies of 11 bamboo species highlight diversification induced by dynamic subgenome dominance.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- A plastid phylogenomic framework for the palm family (Arecaceae).BMC biology · 2023Article
- Integrating genomic and morphological data into bamboo taxonomic and evolutionary studies.Plant diversity · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bamboos (Bambusoideae, Poaceae) comprise a major grass lineage with a complex evolutionary history involving ancient hybridization and allopolyploidy. About 1700 described species are classified into three tribes, Olyreae (herbaceous bamboos), Bambuseae (tropical woody bamboos), and Arundinarieae (temperate woody bamboos). Nuclear analyses strongly support monophyly of the woody tribes, whereas plastome analyses strongly support paraphyly, with Bambuseae sister to Olyreae. Our objectives were to clarify the origin(s) of the woody bamboo tribes and resolve the nuclear vs. plastid conflict using genomic tools. For the first time, plastid and nuclear genomic information from the same bamboo species were combined in a single study. We sampled 51 species of bamboos representing the three tribes, estimated their genome sizes and generated low-depth sample sequence data, from which plastomes were assembled and nuclear repeats were analyzed. The distribution of repeat families was found to agree with nuclear gene phylogenies, but also provides novel insights into nuclear evolutionary history. We infer two early, independent hybridization events, one between an Olyreae ancestor and a woody ancestor giving rise to the two Bambuseae lineages, and another between two woody ancestors giving rise to the Arundinarieae. Retention of the Olyreae plastome associated with differential dominance of nuclear genomes and subsequent diploidization in some lineages explains the paraphyly observed in plastome phylogenetic estimations. We confirm ancient hybridization and allopolyploidy in the origins of the extant woody bamboo lineages and propose biased fractionation and diploidization as important factors in their evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.