"May I Grab Your Attention?": An Investigation Into Infants' Visual Preferences for Handled Objects Using Lookit as an Online Platform for Data Collection.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Best Practices and Methodological Strategies for Addressing Generalizability in Neuropsychological Assessment.Journal of pediatric neuropsychology · 2023
   Review
2. A survey on the challenges, limitations, and opportunities of online testing of infants and young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: using our experiences to improve future practices.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article
3. Intersensory redundancy impedes face recognition in 12-month-old infants.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article
4. Community diversity and the other-race effect in infancy.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article
5. Validation of an open source, remote web-based eye-tracking method (WebGazer) for research in early childhood.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as