Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34566719›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Research by Psychiatric Trainees and Early Career Psychiatrists-Results of a Survey From 34 Countries in Europe.

Katja Koelkebeck, Olivier Andlauer, Marton Asztalos, Nikolina Jovanovic, Olga Kazakova, Sean Naughton, Maja Pantovic-Stefanovic, Florian Riese, Mariana Pinto da Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advanced Research Institute Scholars' Perspectives on Program Success: A Self-determination Theory Evaluation.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Early career psychiatrists' ability to evaluate and manage negative symptoms of schizophrenia - Results from a European survey.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katja KoelkebeckDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Olivier AndlauerEarly and Quick Intervention in Psychosis (EQUIP), East London NHS Foundation Trust, Donald Winnicot Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Marton AsztalosAalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nikolina JovanovicUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Olga KazakovaPsychiatric Clinic of Minsk City, Minsk, Belarus.
Sean NaughtonRotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Maja Pantovic-StefanovicDepartment for Affective Disorders, Clinic of Psychiatry, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Florian RieseUniversity Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mariana Pinto da CostaSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical psychiatric practice should be intricately linked with research work. Although psychiatric trainees and early career psychiatrists (ECPs) are in the frontline of clinical services, little is known about how much access they have to research opportunities. A semi-structured questionnaire of 35 questions-exploring research goals achieved, facilitators and barriers as well as personal context-was sent to psychiatric trainees and ECPs across Europe. The survey was disseminated through the local committees of the main professional psychiatric societies in Europe. A total of 258 individuals working in 34 European countries participated. The majority (69.8%) were psychiatric trainees within training in adult psychiatry. Most participants (69.0%) were highly interested in research, but faced major obstacles toward their research activities, such as lack of time and funding. They were highly satisfied with mentoring and publishing papers. Only half of the participants, however, had already published a scientific article, and only a few have been able to contribute to randomized clinical trials (20.9%). A large proportion of participants (87.2%) reported to conduct research after or during a mixture of working hours and after working hours. Only one tenth ever received a grant for their work. These findings highlight that the key barriers for the performance of research are lack of time and funding. Psychiatric trainees and ECPs are motivated to perform research but need support and regular opportunities.

Indexed as

barriersearly career psychiatristsfacilitatorspsychiatric traineesresearch

Identifiers

PMID34566719
PMCPMC8461014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.