ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2021
A Computational Approach to Modeling an Antagonistic Angiogenic VEGFR1-IL2 Fusion Protein for Cancer Therapy.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fusion Protein Technology to Enhance Pharmacological Properties of L-Asparaginases.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cancer treatment, immunotherapy has great potential for improving the prognosis of patients with hematologic and solid malignancies. In this study, various bioinformatics tools and servers were used to design an antiangiogenic fusion protein. After comprehensive evaluation, an antiangiogenic fusion protein was designed using a soluble extracellular domain of human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR-1) and human interleukin-2 (IL-2) joined by a flexible linker. The final construct was composed of 875 amino acids. The secondary structure of the fusion protein, obtained by CFSSP, PSIPRED, and SOPMA tools, consisted of 14.17% helices, 29.71% extended strands, 4.69% beta turns and 51.43% random coils. Tertiary structure prediction by Raptor X showed that the fusion protein comprises 3 domains with 875 modeled amino acids, out of which 26 positions (2%) were considered disordered. The Ramachandran plot revealed 89.3%, 7.1%, and 3.6% amino acid residues in favored, allowed, and outlier regions, respectively. Physical features of the Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulated system such as root mean square deviation, root mean square fluctuation, solvent-on hand surface region, and radius of gyration identified the fusion construct as a stable and compact protein with few fluctuations in its overall structure. Docking of the fusion protein showed that interaction between sVEGFR-1/VEGFA and IL-2/IL-2R still exists. In silico analysis revealed that the fusion protein comprising IL-2 and sVEGFR-1 has stable structure and the selected linker can efficiently separate the two domains. These observations may be helpful in determining protein stability prior to protein expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.