Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34566384›Full record

ArticleAyu

Effects of

Ruchi Vyas, Garima Sharma, Devki Sain, Rashmi Sisodia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ayu. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radical scavenging activity ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruchi VyasDepartment of Zoology, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Garima SharmaDepartment of Zoology, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Devki SainDepartment of Zoology, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Rashmi SisodiaDepartment of Zoology, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
University of Rajasthan · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation therapy is considered as an important tool in cancer treatment. Despite its impressive role in treating cancer, severe side effects in organs have been reported. To address these therapeutic side effects, several combination methods have been identified to minimize adverse effects caused by radiation therapy. AIMS AND

objectivesBased on higher radioactive sensitivity of testicular tissues, administration of MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo forms of CB extracts (CB alone and CB-silver nanoparticles [AgNPs]) were administered at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight in Swiss albino male mice for 7 consecutive days. Following 6 Gy gamma radiation, animals were observed for 30 days in four phases. Sperm counts, body weight, testicular weight and stereological and histological evaluation of testis were evaluated.

resultsFollowing irradiation, a significant decline in body weight (

conclusionTesticular response was observed against radiation in animals treated with CB extracts, while CB-AgNPs indicated better toleration when compared to CB extract alone.

Indexed as

Chlorophytum borivilianumgamma radiationspermatogenesistesticular damages

Identifiers

PMID34566384
PMCPMC8415242
OpenAlexW3187202105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.