ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021
Clinical Outcome of Cu-T 375 PPIUCD by Novel Dedicated Inserter Technique.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utilisation, effectiveness, and safety of immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a systematic literature review.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2023Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) have been used by women in India for decades for spacing pregnancies. The increased institutional deliveries are an opportunity to provide women easy access to immediate PPIUCD services. Hence, we planned a study to evaluate the role of a novel dedicated inserter technique to improve compliance in postpartum women. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective case-control study was conducted on postpartum women who underwent vaginal delivery. Cases were selected and divided randomly into two groups: the long inserter (n = 292) and control groups (n = 301 using conventional method of insertion). PPIUD was inserted by trained providers, followed by ultrasound within 48 hours of insertion to assess location and fundal placement of the IUD. Follow-up was done at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months post-insertion, and ultrasound assessment was done for IUD location at each visit. Final statistical analysis was done by using Chi-square test.
resultsThere were fewer complications like pain and irregular bleeding in the long inserter group as compared to the control group. None of the cases reported missing thread in the long inserter group. Expulsion was seen in only one case from the long inserter group and five cases in the control group. Client satisfaction was good (98.4%) in the long inserter group, and with each follow-up, satisfaction level also improved in the control group (96.6%,
conclusionThe long inserter PPIUD insertion is a safe and convenient method. It has better ease of insertion, high fundal placement and good thread visibility and has reduced risk of infections as compared to the conventional PPIUD insertion technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.