Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34565905›Full record

ArticleThe Linacre quarterly2021

Hormonally Active Contraceptives, Part II: Sociological, Environmental, and Economic Impact.

William V Williams, Joel Brind, Laura Haynes, Michael D Manhart, Hanna Klaus, Angela Lanfranchi, Gerard Migeon, Michael Gaskins, Elvis I Šeman, Lester Ruppersberger and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Linacre quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

William V WilliamsBriaCell Therapeutics Corporation, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-9284
Joel BrindThe Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
Laura HaynesInternational Federation for Therapeutic and Counseling Choice, General Board Member and USA Country Representative,Tustin, California, USA.
Michael D ManhartCouple to Couple League, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1727-1846
Hanna KlausCatholic Medical Association, Fort Washington, PA, USA.
Angela LanfranchiCatholic Medical Association, Fort Washington, PA, USA.
Gerard MigeonNatural Womanhood, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Michael GaskinsIndependent Author, Ft. Worth, TX, USA.
Elvis I ŠemanFlinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Lester RuppersbergerCatholic Medical Association, Fort Washington, PA, USA.
Kathleen M RavieleCatholic Medical Association, Fort Washington, PA, USA.
National Medical Association · USArk Therapeutic (United States) · USFlinders University · AUPrevention Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USWoman’s Hospital of Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the sociological, environmental, and economic impact of hormonally active contraceptives, a series of comprehensive literature surveys were employed. Sociological effects are discussed including abortion, exploitation of women, a weakening of marriage, and an increase in divorce with deleterious effects on children such as child poverty, poorer health, lower educational achievement, suicide risks, drug and alcohol abuse, criminality, and incarceration, among others. The environmental impact is discussed briefly and includes the feminization and trans-gendering of male fish downstream from the effluent of city wastewater treatment plants with declining fish populations. The potential economic impact of most of these side effects is estimated based on epidemiologic data and published estimates of costs of caring for the diseases which are linked to the use of hormonally active contraceptives. Hormonally active contraceptives appear to have a deleterious impact on multiple aspects of women's health as well as negative economic and environmental impacts. These risks can be avoided through the use of nonhormonal methods and need to be more clearly conveyed to the public. SUMMARY: Hormonal contraceptives have wide-ranging effects.  The potential economic impact of the medical side effects is estimated. Sociological effects are discussed including abortion, exploitation of women, a weakening of marriage and an increase in divorce with negative effects on children such as child poverty, poorer health, lower educational achievement, suicide risks, drug and alcohol abuse, criminality and incarceration among others. The environmental impact includes hormonal effects on fish with declining fish populations. Women seeking birth control have a right to know about how to avoid these risks by using effective hormone-free methods like Fertility Awareness Methods.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityCancerCardiovascular diseaseContraceptionDepressionEconomic impactEpidemiologyHuman interaction with the environmentOsteoporosisSociology

Identifiers

PMID34565905
PMCPMC8375383
OpenAlexW3156848982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.