Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34565805›Full record

ArticleBiological conservation2021

Mentorship, equity, and research productivity: lessons from a pandemic.

Mallika A Nocco, Bonnie M McGill, Caitlin McDonough MacKenzie, Rebecca K Tonietto, Joan Dudney, Molly C Bletz, Talia Young, Sara E Kuebbing

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological conservation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primate Research and Conservation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Mapping the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacy graduate students' wellness.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mallika A NoccoDepartment of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Bonnie M McGillAnthropocene Science Section, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
Caitlin McDonough MacKenzieClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, United States of America.
Rebecca K ToniettoDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan - Flint, Flint, MI 48502, United States of America.
Joan DudneyDepartment of Plant Sciences, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Molly C BletzUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Department of Biology, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.
Talia YoungRutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States of America.
Sara E KuebbingDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USCarnegie Museum of Natural History · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USUniversity of Michigan–Flint · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic is more fully exposing ubiquitous economic and social inequities that pervade conservation science. In this time of prolonged stress on members of the research community, primary investigators or project leaders (PLs) have a unique opportunity to adapt their programs to jointly create more equitable and productive research environments for their teams. Institutional guidance for PLs pursuing field and laboratory work centers on the physical safety of individuals while in the lab or field, but largely ignores the vast differences in how team members may be experiencing the pandemic. Strains on mental, physical, and emotional health; racial trauma; familial responsibilities; and compulsory productivity resources, such as high-speed internet, quiet work spaces, and support are unequally distributed across team members. The goal of this paper is to summarize the shifting dynamics of leadership and mentorship during the coronavirus pandemic and highlight opportunities for increasing equity in conservation research at the scale of the project team. Here, we (1) describe how the pandemic differentially manifests inequity on project teams, particularly for groups that have been structurally excluded from conservation science, (2) consider equitable career advancement during the coronavirus pandemic, and (3) offer suggestions for PLs to provide mentorship that prioritizes equity and wellbeing during and beyond the pandemic. We aim to support PLs who have power and flexibility in how they manage research, teaching, mentoring, consulting, outreach, and extension activities so that individual team members' needs are met with compassion and attention to equity.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19DiversityEquityMentorshipPandemic

Identifiers

PMID34565805
PMCPMC8455165
OpenAlexW3126572065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.