Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34565426›Full record

ReviewHereditary cancer in clinical practice2021

Risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 hereditary ovarian cancer syndromes: a clinical practice guideline.

Michelle Jacobson, Nadia Coakley, Marcus Bernardini, Kelly-Ann Branco, Laurie Elit, Sarah Ferguson, Raymond Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Risk-reducing decisions regarding germlineJournal of medical genetics · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Hereditary cancer syndromes.World journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Radiologic screening and surveillance in hereditary cancers.European journal of radiology open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle JacobsonWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nadia CoakleyDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. coaklen@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9210-7299
Marcus BernardiniUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kelly-Ann BrancoPatient Representative, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laurie ElitDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sarah FergusonUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Raymond KimUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CACancer Care Ontario · CAJuravinski Cancer Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this guideline is to make recommendations regarding the care of women who harbour a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

methodsDraft recommendations were formulated based on evidence obtained through a systematic review of RCTs, comparative retrospective studies and guideline endorsement. The draft recommendations underwent an internal review by clinical and methodology experts, and an external review by clinical practitioners.

resultsThe literature search yielded 1 guideline, 5 systematic reviews, and 15 studies that met the eligibility criteria.

conclusionsIn women who harbour a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening for ovarian cancer is not recommended. Risk-reducing surgery is recommended to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. In the absence of contraindications, premenopausal women undergoing RRSO should be offered hormone therapy until menopause. Systemic hormone replacement therapy, is not recommended for women who have had a personal history of breast cancer. RRSO should be considered for breast cancer risk reduction in women younger than 50 years. After a breast cancer diagnosis, RRSO for breast cancer mortality reduction can be considered within two years to women who harbour a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1 if younger than the recommended age range for ovarian cancer risk reduction. RRSO before the age of 40 and specifically for breast cancer treatment in BRCA2 should be considered only if recommended by their breast cancer oncologist. Following RRSO, it is not recommended to do surveillance for peritoneal cancer.

Indexed as

BRCA1/2Cancer Care OntarioGuideline recommendationsHBOCOvarian cancerRRSOScreeningSurgerySystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID34565426
PMCPMC8474940
OpenAlexW3204480707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.