Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34565351›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Population preferences and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination: a cross-sectional study from Pakistan.

Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Muhammad Saqlain, Waleed Tariq, Summaiya Waheed, Steven H S Tan, Sarim Irhas Nasir, Irfan Ullah, Ali Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 vaccination up-take in three districts of Nepal.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Junaid TahirAmeer-ud-Din Medical College Affiliated with University of Health Sciences, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0335-6681
Muhammad SaqlainDepartment of Pharmacy, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-4165
Waleed TariqAmeer-ud-Din Medical College Affiliated with University of Health Sciences, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-2710
Summaiya WaheedDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-3039
Steven H S TanNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Nusajaya, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-5960
Sarim Irhas NasirKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-3279
Irfan UllahKabir Medical College, Gandhara University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1100-101X
Ali AhmedDepartment of Pharmacy, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan. ali.ahmed@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8964-1853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile vaccine development is itself a challenge; ensuring optimal vaccine uptake at population level can present an even more significant challenge. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the Pakistani population's attitude and preferences towards the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine.

methodA cross-sectional study was carried out through an online self-administered questionnaire from 27 September 2020 to 11 October 2020. A total of 883 people responded to the survey. The questionnaire included the participants' socio-demographic variables, attitudes, beliefs towards the COVID-19 vaccine and acceptance and rejection of vaccination, and reasons for them. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the predictors for vaccine acceptance and willingness to pay for the vaccine.

resultsA majority (70.8%) of respondents will accept the COVID-19vaccine if available, and 66.8% showed a positive attitude towards vaccination. Monthly family income, education level, self-diagnosis of COVID-19 or a friend, family member, or colleague are significant factors influencing the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. The dogma of being naturally immune to COVID-19 was a key reason for the refusal of the vaccine. Less than half (48%) of those who refuse will vaccinate themselves if government officials have made it compulsory. A third (33.9%) of participants were willing to pay up to (7 USD) 1000 Pkr (Pakistani Rupees) for the vaccine.

conclusionThe population's positive attitude should be improved by increasing awareness and eradicating false myths about vaccines through large-scale campaigns.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPakistanSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAttitudeBarriersCOVID-19MythsPakistanRejectionVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34565351
PMCPMC8474768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.