Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34565332›Full record

ReviewMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

Addressing the 'hypoxia paradox' in severe COVID-19: literature review and report of four cases treated with erythropoietin analogues.

Martin Begemann, Oliver Gross, Dominik Wincewicz, Rüdiger Hardeland, Vinicius Daguano Gastaldi, Eduard Vieta, Karin Weissenborn, Kamilla W Miskowiak, Onnen Moerer, Hannelore Ehrenreich

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Administration in Critically ill COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin Begemann *Clinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hermann-Rein-Str.3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0493-7370
Oliver Gross *Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8390-8852
Dominik WincewiczHospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-6306
Rüdiger HardelandJohann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology & Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-6378
Vinicius Daguano GastaldiClinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hermann-Rein-Str.3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6249-6035
Eduard VietaHospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-0053
Karin WeissenbornDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-8938
Kamilla W MiskowiakPsychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-1384
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-388X
Hannelore EhrenreichClinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hermann-Rein-Str.3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. ehrenreich@em.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8371-5711
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DECentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESMax Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · DECopenhagen University Hospital · DKMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

dfg TRR 274/1 2020 - 408885537lundbeckfonden R215-2015-4121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince fall 2019, SARS-CoV-2 spread world-wide, causing a major pandemic with estimated ~ 220 million subjects affected as of September 2021. Severe COVID-19 is associated with multiple organ failure, particularly of lung and kidney, but also grave neuropsychiatric manifestations. Overall mortality reaches > 2%. Vaccine development has thrived in thus far unreached dimensions and will be one prerequisite to terminate the pandemic. Despite intensive research, however, few treatment options for modifying COVID-19 course/outcome have emerged since the pandemic outbreak. Additionally, the substantial threat of serious downstream sequelae, called 'long COVID' and 'neuroCOVID', becomes increasingly evident. Among candidates that were suggested but did not yet receive appropriate funding for clinical trials is recombinant human erythropoietin. Based on accumulating experimental and clinical evidence, erythropoietin is expected to (1) improve respiration/organ function, (2) counteract overshooting inflammation, (3) act sustainably neuroprotective/neuroregenerative. Recent counterintuitive findings of decreased serum erythropoietin levels in severe COVID-19 not only support a relative deficiency of erythropoietin in this condition, which can be therapeutically addressed, but also made us coin the term 'hypoxia paradox'. As we review here, this paradox is likely due to uncoupling of physiological hypoxia signaling circuits, mediated by detrimental gene products of SARS-CoV-2 or unfavorable host responses, including microRNAs or dysfunctional mitochondria. Substitution of erythropoietin might overcome this 'hypoxia paradox' caused by deranged signaling and improve survival/functional status of COVID-19 patients and their long-term outcome. As supporting hints, embedded in this review, we present 4 male patients with severe COVID-19 and unfavorable prognosis, including predicted high lethality, who all profoundly improved upon treatment which included erythropoietin analogues. SHORT

conclusionSubstitution of EPO may-among other beneficial EPO effects in severe COVID-19-circumvent downstream consequences of the 'hypoxia paradox'. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial for proof-of-concept is warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCOVID-19ErythropoietinHumansHypoxiaLungPandemicsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRecombinant ProteinsSARS-CoV-2EPO protein, humanErythropoietinRecombinant ProteinsCritical careDarbepoetinNeuroprotectionOutcomeRecombinant human EPOSignalingTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34565332
PMCPMC8474703
OpenAlexW3204131121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.