ArticleChronic respiratory disease
Comparison of the sensitivity of patient-reported outcomes for detecting the benefit of biologics in severe asthma.
Article in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation and cross-cultural insights of the French translation of the Severe Asthma Questionnaire.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Do Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Used Within Radiotherapy Clinical Trials Reflect the Impact of Treatment?Cancers · 2024Review
- Impact of comorbidities on EQ-5D quality-of-life index in severe asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Determinants in Chronic Cough: The Korean Chronic Cough Registry Study.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2023Article
- Roles of real-world evidence in severe asthma treatment: challenges and opportunities.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test: A systematic review of measurement properties and COSMIN analysis.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Review
- CRD editor's corner archive: July-September.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundThe sensitivity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to detect the effects of treatment change depends on the match between the change in items of the PRO and the change that takes place in a sample of people. The aim of this study is to compare the sensitivity of different PROs in detecting changes following the initiation of biologic treatment in asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.