Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34565193›Full record

Trial reportCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

A Low Literacy, Multimedia Health Information Technology Intervention to Enhance Patient-Centered Cancer Care in Safety Net Settings Increased Cancer Knowledge in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

John D Peipert, Thomas Lad, Pam G Khosla, Sofia F Garcia, Elizabeth A Hahn

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interactive digital tools to support empowerment of people with cancer: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John D PeipertDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, 12244Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-7881
Thomas LadJohn H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pam G KhoslaMount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sofia F GarciaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, 12244Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth A HahnDepartment of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, 12244Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Implementing a low-literacy, multimedia IT system to enhance patient-centered canR18HS017300 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HAHN, ELIZABETH A · 2007 to 2009
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS017300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested whether a low-literacy-friendly, multimedia information and assessment system used in daily clinical practice enhanced patient-centered care and improved patient outcomes. This was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 2 arms, CancerHelp-Talking Touchscreen (CancerHelp-TT) versus control, among adults with Stage I-III breast or colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in safety net settings. Each patient was assessed for outcomes at 4 timepoints: after starting treatment (baseline), during treatment, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up assessment. The primary outcomes were health beliefs, cancer knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with communication about cancer and its treatments. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was a secondary outcome. A total of 129 patients participated in the study (65 intervention and 64 control), and approximately 50% of these completed the study. Patients randomized to receive the CancerHelp-TT program had a significantly larger increase in their cancer knowledge in comparison to those randomized to the control arm (effect size = .48,

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSafety-net Providerscancerhealth information technologyhealth literacyunderserved populations

Identifiers

PMID34565193
PMCPMC8481731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.