ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of pirfenidone 200 mg tablets in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in a real-life setting
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of pirfenidone and nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Phase III trials have demonstrated a significant efficacy and an acceptable safety for pirfenidone in patients having mild to moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Real-life data on the use of pirfenidone 200 mg tablets are limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone 200 mg tablets for the treatment of IPF in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: A retrospective, multicenter study conducted in four university hospitals in Turkey between January 2017 and January 2019. Clinical records of patients diagnosed with mild to moderate IPF and receiving pirfenidone (200 mg tablets, total 2400 mg/day) were reviewed retrospectively and consecutively. Pulmonary function measurements including forced vital capacity (FVC%) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO%) were analyzed at baseline and after 6-month of pirfenidone treatment. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean, standard error or median (minimum-maximum), number and percentage, where appropriate. Results: The study included 82 patients, of whom 87.8% were males (mean age, 66 years). After 6-month of treatment, 7 patients discontinued the treatment. Of the remaining 75 patients, 71 (94.6%) remained stable, 4 (5.4%) had progressive disease as evident by a decline in the FVC% of at least 10% while on treatment, and 45 (61.3%) had improved cough. At least one adverse event (AE) associated with the treatment was observed in 28 (37.3%) patients. Conclusion: Pirfenidone 200 mg was effective and well tolerated and associated with relatively mild and manageable AEs in IPF patien
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.