Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34564835›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2021

Racial Differences in Prevalence and Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis by Insurance Coverage in the USA.

Alexis Ogdie, Wesley Matthias, Richard J Thielen, Daniel Chin, Christopher D Saffore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Health Disparities in Rheumatology in the United States.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis OgdieUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wesley MatthiasHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie Inc., 1 N Waukegan Road, Dept. GMH1, ABV1 4NW-102-04, North Chicago, IL, 60064-6078, USA.
Richard J ThielenHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie Inc., 1 N Waukegan Road, Dept. GMH1, ABV1 4NW-102-04, North Chicago, IL, 60064-6078, USA.
Daniel ChinHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie Inc., 1 N Waukegan Road, Dept. GMH1, ABV1 4NW-102-04, North Chicago, IL, 60064-6078, USA.
Christopher D SafforeHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie Inc., 1 N Waukegan Road, Dept. GMH1, ABV1 4NW-102-04, North Chicago, IL, 60064-6078, USA. christopher.saffore@abbvie.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) may receive suboptimal care, and differences in care by race/ethnicity, sex, and insurance coverage are not well studied.

methodsThis was a descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional US claims database analysis utilizing the Medicaid multi-state segment of the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Supplemental Database and Optum Insight Clinformatics® Data Mart database for 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with PsA or AS and continuous medical and pharmacy coverage were included. Outcomes evaluated were prevalence and percentage of patients receiving biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) or visiting a rheumatologist. Outcomes were stratified by race/ethnicity, sex, and insurance coverage, with outcomes determined for commercial insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid enrollees. Differences observed in outcomes were numerical in nature.

resultsPrevalences of PsA and AS were highest for Medicare enrollees (320 and 156 per 100,000 persons [0.32 and 0.16%], respectively) and lowest for Medicaid enrollees (132 and 71 per 100,000 persons [0.13 and 0.07%], respectively). White patients had the greatest prevalence versus patients of other races/ethnicities. Females had a higher prevalence of PsA than males, while AS prevalence was generally lower for females versus males for each insurance category. The percentage of patients prescribed bDMARDs/tsDMARDs was highest for commercial insurance enrollees (PsA 63%, AS 43%) and lowest for Medicare enrollees (PsA 21%, AS 11%). The proportion of patients who saw a rheumatologist was lower for Medicaid enrollees (PsA 12%, AS 10%) than for commercial insurance or Medicare enrollees (PsA 68%, 55%; AS 67%, 42%). For commercial insurance and Medicare enrollees, the percentage of patients visiting a rheumatologist was similar by race/ethnicity but higher for females versus males.

conclusionsThe prevalence and treatment of PsA and AS differs by race/ethnicity, insurance coverage, and sex in the USA. Efforts for improving access to care are needed to improve outcomes among all patients.

Indexed as

Ankylosing spondylitisCommercial insuranceMedicaidMedicarePrevalencePsoriatic arthritisRheumatologistTargeted immunomodulatorUSA

Identifiers

PMID34564835
PMCPMC8475338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.