ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2021
Is our breathing optimal? Solving a piecewise linear model with constraints.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper is motivated by a question related to the control of amplitude and frequency of breathing. We present a simplified mathematical model, consisting of two piecewise linear ordinary differential equations, that could represent gas exchange in the lungs. We then define and solve an optimal control problem with unknown durations of inhalation and exhalation, subject to several constraints. The durations are divided such that one of the state variables is strictly increasing during the first phase and decreasing during the second phase. The optimal control problem can be solved analytically. One analytical solution is found when the forcing is a given sinusoidal function with unknown period and amplitude. Other analytical solutions are found when the forcing function, the period and the duration of the first phase are unknown but the amplitude is given. Our results show that different cost functions can produce different optimal forcing functions. We also show that the shape of these functions does not affect the average levels of oxygen in the lungs-the average level of oxygen is only dependent on the amplitude and period of breathing in the model we present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34564767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.