Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34564717›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2022

Liquid-Immersion Reprocessing Effects on Filtration Efficiency of 'Single-Use' Commercial Medical Face Masks.

Richard J Everts, Shadha Al Ghusaini, Lucy Telfar-Barnard, Ella Barclay, Shaun Tan, Sonja Jekel, Lance Jennings, Dong Hoon Choi, Dougal Hilson, Barbara Gibson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard J EvertsInfectious Disease Service, Nelson Bays Primary Health, 281 Queen St, Richmond, Nelson, New Zealand.
Shadha Al GhusainiUniversity of Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Lucy Telfar-BarnardDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, 23a Mein St, Newton, Wellington, New Zealand.
Ella BarclayUniversity of Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Shaun TanLanaco, 2-4 Sultan St, Ellerslie, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sonja JekelLanaco, 2-4 Sultan St, Ellerslie, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lance JenningsDepartment of Pathology and Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Dong Hoon ChoiBiomedical Engineering Department, Nelson Hospital, Tipahi St, Nelson, New Zealand.
Dougal HilsonUniversity of Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Barbara GibsonInfection Prevention and Control Service, Nelson Hospital, Tipahi St, Nelson, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZNelson Marlborough Institute of Technology · NZCanterbury Health Laboratories · NZ

Funding

Nelson Medical Research and Education Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical masks have inferior filtration efficiency and fit to filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) but are widely used in healthcare and the community. These masks are intended for disposal after use but in the event of mask shortage re-use after reprocessing may be an option. We investigated eight reprocessing methods that each involved washing or soaking in liquid, are likely to eliminate respiratory viruses, and are safe and available in most community and healthcare settings.

methodsThree brands of EN 14683 standards-compliant commercial medical mask were each reprocessed 10 times by one of eight methods. We measured filtration efficiency for poly-dispersed sodium chloride particles and pressure differential.

resultsCompared with new medical masks, reprocessed masks had significantly reduced filtration efficiency. The reduction was mild-moderate (6.5-25.8%) after warm water wash, hot water soak or boiling water soak; and moderate-large (24.1-51.5%) after detergent, soap or laundry machine wash, or bleach soak. There were mixed and minor changes in pressure differential. Most reprocessed standards-compliant masks had better filtration efficiency than new non-standard commercial masks and then cotton and cotton-polyester mix fabric samples, even triple-layered fabrics.

conclusionsHigh-quality commercial medical masks reprocessed 10 times by water immersion methods had better filtration efficiency than new non-standard masks and washable fabrics. These findings have particular relevance for community and low-resource healthcare settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational ExposureHumansImmersionMasksSARS-CoV-2coronavirusCOVIDdisinfectionfacemaskfiltrationinfluenzamaskreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID34564717
PMCPMC8500144
OpenAlexW3203758855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.