Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34564620›Full record

ReviewToxins2021

Venom Immunotherapy: From Proteins to Product to Patient Protection.

Martin Feindor, Matthew D Heath, Simon J Hewings, Thalia L Carreno Velazquez, Simon Blank, Johannes Grosch, Thilo Jakob, Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier, Ludger Klimek, David B K Golden and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy in Dogs: Safety and Clinical Efficacy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martin FeindorAllergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd., Worthing BN14 8SA, UK.
Matthew D HeathAllergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd., Worthing BN14 8SA, UK.
Simon J HewingsAllergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd., Worthing BN14 8SA, UK.
Thalia L Carreno VelazquezAllergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd., Worthing BN14 8SA, UK.
Simon BlankCenter of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, 85764 Munich, Germany.
Johannes GroschCenter of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, 85764 Munich, Germany.
Thilo JakobExperimental Dermatology and Allergy Research Group, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.
Peter Schmid-GrendelmeierAllergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Ludger KlimekCenter for Rhinology and Allergology, 65183 Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2455-0192
David B K GoldenChesapeake Clinical Research, Baltimore, MA 21236-5992, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7596-3707
Murray A SkinnerAllergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd., Worthing BN14 8SA, UK.
Matthias F KramerAllergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd., Worthing BN14 8SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3740-4733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we outline and reflect on the important differences between allergen-specific immunotherapy for inhalant allergies (i.e., aeroallergens) and venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT), with a special focus on Venomil

Indexed as

AllergensAnimalsBeesBee VenomsDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansHypersensitivityWaspsWasp VenomsAllergensBee VenomsWasp Venomsadjuvantallergyhoneybee venomHymenopterasensitizationvenomVITwasp venom

Identifiers

PMID34564620
PMCPMC8470233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.