Article in Veterinary sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Ana RabazaInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-0797
Federico GiannittiInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.
Martín FragaInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.
Melissa Macías-RiosecoInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.
Luis G CorbelliniInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0003-3255-6321
Franklin Riet-CorreaInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.
Darío HirigoyenInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay.
Katy M E TurnerBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Mark C EislerBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-3345
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria · UYUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR
Funding
Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación POS_EXT_2015_1_123804Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria PL_27 N-23398
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Cattle are broadly deemed a source of
Indexed as
coxiellosisindirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT)occupational hazardQ feverzoonosis
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Serological Evidence of Human Infection with · full record | OpenQuestion