ArticleMembranes2021
Rejection Capacity of Nanofiltration Membranes for Nickel, Copper, Silver and Palladium at Various Oxidation States.
Article in Membranes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Charge-Tunable Polyelectrolytes Enable High-Performance Layer-by-Layer Nanofiltration Membranes for Heavy Metal Ion Removal.Membranes · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Metal Ion Recovery Based on Membrane Technology and Adsorption Synergy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Simulation Study of Chain-like Body Translocation through Conical Pores in Thick Membranes.Membranes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroplating and metalworking industries produce enormous amounts of waste containing heavy metals in their effluents, leading to potential threats to biotic and abiotic life. According to regulation, heavy metal contamination must be kept within the regulated standard of a few parts per million, which has led to a recent pique in interest in the utilization of nanofiltration technology for metal recovery. The effect of feed pH, pressure, metal concentration, and oxidation of metal on the rejection of heavy metal ions using three commercial nanofiltration membranes (NF, NF90, and NF270) were explored. To begin, studies of electrolyte salts, contact angle, and water permeability were employed to characterize the nanofiltration membranes. A dead-end module was used to test the permeation and retention capacities of the nanofiltration membranes. The results showed an increase in salt rejection for all metals examined irrespective of the membrane, at a pH below the isoelectric point. For divalent cations, the NF90 membrane achieved recovery capacities of 97% and 85% at 200 ppm and 20 ppm respectively, as compared to the recovery observed for Ni
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.