Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34564115›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2021

Per-COVID-19: A Benchmark Dataset for COVID-19 Percentage Estimation from CT-Scans.

Fares Bougourzi, Cosimo Distante, Abdelkrim Ouafi, Fadi Dornaika, Abdenour Hadid, Abdelmalik Taleb-Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fares BougourziInstitute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems, National Research Council of Italy, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5077-4862
Cosimo DistanteInstitute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems, National Research Council of Italy, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-2390
Abdelkrim OuafiLaboratory of LESIA, University of Biskra, Biskra 7000, Algeria.
Fadi DornaikaUniversity of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 20018 San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6581-9680
Abdenour HadidUniversity Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, University Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 8520-IEMN, F-59313 Valenciennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-735X
Abdelmalik Taleb-AhmedUniversity Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, University Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 8520-IEMN, F-59313 Valenciennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8750-1905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 infection recognition is a very important step in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, many methods have been used to recognize COVID-19 infection including Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), X-ray scan, and Computed Tomography scan (CT- scan). In addition to the recognition of the COVID-19 infection, CT scans can provide more important information about the evolution of this disease and its severity. With the extensive number of COVID-19 infections, estimating the COVID-19 percentage can help the intensive care to free up the resuscitation beds for the critical cases and follow other protocol for less severity cases. In this paper, we introduce COVID-19 percentage estimation dataset from CT-scans, where the labeling process was accomplished by two expert radiologists. Moreover, we evaluate the performance of three Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures: ResneXt-50, Densenet-161, and Inception-v3. For the three CNN architectures, we use two loss functions: MSE and Dynamic Huber. In addition, two pretrained scenarios are investigated (ImageNet pretrained models and pretrained models using X-ray data). The evaluated approaches achieved promising results on the estimation of COVID-19 infection. Inception-v3 using Dynamic Huber loss function and pretrained models using X-ray data achieved the best performance for slice-level results: 0.9365, 5.10, and 9.25 for Pearson Correlation coefficient (PC), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), respectively. On the other hand, the same approach achieved 0.9603, 4.01, and 6.79 for PCsubj, MAEsubj, and RMSEsubj, respectively, for subject-level results. These results prove that using CNN architectures can provide accurate and fast solution to estimate the COVID-19 infection percentage for monitoring the evolution of the patient state.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkCOVID-19CT-scansdataset generationdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID34564115
PMCPMC8468956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.