Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563441›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2022

Radiology Stereotypes, Application Barriers, and Hospital Integration: A Mixed-methods Study of Medical Student Perceptions of Radiology.

Lars J Grimm, Laura J Fish, Caroline Wt Carrico, Jonathan G Martin, Vesta C Nwankwo, Samantha Farley, Carolyn C Meltzer, Charles M Maxfield

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lars J GrimmDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710; Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3917, Durham, NC 27710. Electronic address: Lars.grimm@duke.edu.
Laura J FishDuke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3917, Durham, NC 27710; Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Caroline Wt CarricoDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710.
Jonathan G MartinDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710.
Vesta C NwankwoDepartment of Radiology, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Samantha FarleyDuke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3917, Durham, NC 27710.
Carolyn C MeltzerDepartments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, and Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Charles M MaxfieldDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USDuke Cancer InstituteEmory University Hospital · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesLimited exposure to radiology by medical students can perpetuate negative stereotypes and hamper recruitment efforts. The purpose of this study is to understand medical students' perceptions of radiology and how they change based on medical education and exposure. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-institution mixed-methods study included four groups of medical students with different levels of radiology exposure. All participants completed a 16-item survey regarding demographics, opinions of radiology, and perception of radiology stereotypes. Ten focus groups were administered to probe perceptions of radiology. Focus groups were coded to identify specific themes in conjunction with the survey results.

resultsForty-nine participants were included. Forty-two percent of participants had positive opinions of radiology. Multiple radiology stereotypes were identified, and false stereotypes were diminished with increased radiology exposure. Opinions of the impact of artificial intelligence on radiology closely aligned with positive or negative views of the field overall. Multiple barriers to applying for a radiology residency position were identified including board scores and lack of mentorship. COVID-19 did not affect perceptions of radiology. There was broad agreement that students do not enter medical school with many preconceived notions of radiology, but that subsequent exposure was generally positive. Exposure both solidified and eliminated various stereotypes. Finally, there was general agreement that radiology is integral to the health system with broad exposure on all services.

conclusionMedical student perceptions of radiology are notably influenced by exposure and radiology programs should take active steps to engage in medical student education.

Indexed as

COVID-19RadiologyStudents, MedicalArtificial IntelligenceHospitalsHumansapplicationCOVID-19medical studentsradiology rotationstereotypes

Identifiers

PMID34563441
PMCPMC10150737
OpenAlexW3201289796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.