Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563237›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2021

Contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging: a review of stem cell tracking.

Soorya James, Kai Neuhaus, Mary Murphy, Martin Leahy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ACS nano · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. HSA-ZW800-PEG for Enhanced Optophysical Stability and Tumor Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of differentScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Soorya JamesTissue Optics and Microcirculation Imaging facility,School of Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9324-3201
Kai NeuhausTissue Optics and Microcirculation Imaging facility,School of Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
Mary MurphyThe Regenerative Medicine Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
Martin LeahyTissue Optics and Microcirculation Imaging facility,School of Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. martin.leahy@nuigalway.ie.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEInstitute of Photonic Sciences · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of stem cell therapy for spinal cord injuries, stroke, burns, macular degeneration, heart diseases, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis; the need to track the survival, migration pathways, spatial destination and differentiation of transplanted stem cells in a clinical setting has gained increased relevance. Indeed, getting regulatory approval to use these therapies in the clinic depends on biodistribution studies. Although optoacoustic imaging (OAI) or photoacoustic imaging can detect functional information of cell activities in real-time, the selection and application of suitable contrast agents is essential to achieve optimal sensitivity and contrast for sensing at clinically relevant depths and can even provide information about molecular activity. This review explores OAI methodologies in conjunction with the specific application of exogenous contrast agents in comparison to other imaging modalities and describes the properties of exogenous contrast agents for quantitative and qualitative monitoring of stem cells. Specific characteristics such as biocompatibility, the absorption coefficient, and surface functionalization are compared and how the labelling efficiency translates to both short and long-term visualization of mesenchymal stem cells is explored. An overview of novel properties of recently developed optoacoustic contrast agents and their capability to detect disease and recovery progression in clinical settings is provided which includes newly developed exogenous contrast agents to monitor stem cells in real-time for multimodal sensing.

Indexed as

Cell TrackingPhotoacoustic TechniquesContrast MediaStem CellsTissue DistributionContrast MediaContrast agentsMescenchymal stem cellsOptoacousticPhotoacousticStem cell tracking

Identifiers

PMID34563237
PMCPMC8467005
OpenAlexW3202169956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.