Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563214›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Elosulfase alfa in the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA: insights from the first managed access agreement.

Bob Stevens, Tom Kenny, Sophie Thomas, Alexandra Morrison, James Jarrett, Mohit Jain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent advances in mucopolysaccharidosis IVA treatment.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA: Current Disease Models and Drawbacks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bob StevensThe MPS Society, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Tom KennyRare Disease Research Partners, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Sophie ThomasThe MPS Society, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Alexandra MorrisonRare Disease Research Partners, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK.
James JarrettBioMarin International Ltd., London, UK.
Mohit JainBioMarin Europe Ltd., 10 Bloomsbury Way, London, WC1A 2SL, UK. mjain@bmrn.com.
BioMarin (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managed access agreements provide a crucial mechanism whereby real-world data can be collected systematically to reduce uncertainty around available clinical and economic data, whilst providing the opportunity to identify patient sub-populations who are most likely to benefit from a new treatment. This manuscript aims to share learnings from the first managed access agreement, which was initiated following positive conditional approval in 2015 from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for elosulfase alfa, an enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA (MPS IVA). This managed access agreement enabled the collection of comprehensive real-world data for patients with MPS IVA, with results demonstrating that patients starting elosulfase alfa treatment showed gains similar to those seen in the pivotal trial for outcomes including endurance, respiratory and cardiac function, pain, quality of life measures and urinary keratan sulfate levels. In addition, former trial patients continued to see benefits in both clinical assessments and quality of life/activities of daily living nine years after beginning treatment. Key strengths of the process included recruitment of a high proportion of MPS IVA patients treated in England (72/89 known eligible patients) with a wide range of ages (2-58 years). Participation of a patient organisation (the MPS society) ensured that the patient voice was present throughout the process, whilst a contract research organisation (Rare Disease Research Partners) ensured that patients were represented when interpreting agreement criteria and during patient assessment meetings. Longer-term follow-up will be required for several MPS IVA outcomes (e.g. skeletal measures) to further reduce uncertainty, and continued follow-up of patients who had stopped treatment was found to be challenging. The burden associated with this managed access agreement was found to be high for patients, physicians, patient organisations, NHS England and the manufacturer, therefore costs and benefits of future agreements should be considered carefully before initiation. Through evaluation of the strengths and limitations of this process, it is hoped that learnings from this managed access agreement can be used to inform future agreements.

Indexed as

ChondroitinsulfatasesMucopolysaccharidosis IVActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEnzyme Replacement TherapyHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeYoung AdultChondroitinsulfatasesGALNS protein, humanElosulfase alfaManaged access agreementMorquio AMucopolysaccharidosis type IVA

Identifiers

PMID34563214
PMCPMC8467187
OpenAlexW3204130597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.