Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563171›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

Improving interagency service integration of the Australian Nurse Family Partnership Program for First Nations women and babies: a qualitative study.

Luciana Massi, Sophie Hickey, Sarah-Jade Maidment, Yvette Roe, Sue Kildea, Carmel Nelson, Sue Kruske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciana MassiMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sophie HickeyMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. sophie.hickey@cdu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7291-1258
Sarah-Jade MaidmentMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Yvette RoeMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sue KildeaMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Carmel NelsonInstitute of Urban Indigenous Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sue KruskeMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Australian Nurse Family Partnership Program (ANFPP) is an evidence-based, home visiting program that offers health education, guidance, social and emotional support to first-time mothers having Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) babies. The community-controlled sector identified the need for specialised support for first time mothers due to the inequalities in birthing and early childhood outcomes between First Nations' and other babies in Australia. The program is based on the United States' Nurse Family Partnership program which has improved long-term health outcomes and life trajectories for mothers and children. International implementation of the Nurse Family Partnership program has identified interagency service integration as key to program recruitment, retention, and efficacy. How the ANFPP integrates with other services in an Australian urban setting and how to improve this is not yet known. Our research explores the barriers and enablers to interagency service integration for the Australian Nurse Family Partnership Program ANFPP in an urban setting.

methodsA qualitative study using individual and group interviews. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit clients, staff (internal and external to the program), Elders and family members. Interviews were conducted using a culturally appropriate 'yarning' method with clients, families and Elders and semi-structured interview guide for staff. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed prior to reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsSeventy-six participants were interviewed: 26 clients, 47 staff and 3 Elders/family members. Three themes were identified as barriers and three as enablers. Barriers: 1) confusion around program scope, 2) duplication of care, and 3) tensions over 'ownership' of clients. Enablers (existing and potential): 1) knowledge and promotion of the program; 2) cultural safety; and 3) case coordination, co-location and partnership forums.

conclusionEffective service integration is essential to maximise access and acceptability of the ANFPP; we provide practical recommendations to improve service integration in this context.

Indexed as

Family NursingHealth Services, IndigenousInterinstitutional RelationsAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesFemaleHumansInfantProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchAboriginal and Torres Strait IslanderCultural-safetyFirst NationsHealth services researchHome visitingIndigenousInteragency service integrationMaternal and infant healthNurse Family Partnership programPregnancyStrengths-based

Identifiers

PMID34563171
PMCPMC8465693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.