ArticleBMC family practice2021
Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts.
Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communication Strategies to Promote Patient Engagement in Telemedicine: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- General practitioners' experience about synchronous teleconsultation in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Digital Health on Patient-Provider Relationships in Respiratory Secondary Care Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Covid-19 hotlines, helplines and call centers: a systematic review of characteristics, challenges and lessons learned.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Telehealth for the Longitudinal Management of Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- How to Best Develop and Deliver Generic Long-Term Condition Rehabilitation Programmes in Rural Settings: An Integrative Review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Pooled it
- The impact of an integrated early palliative care telehealth intervention on the quality of life of heart failure patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study.BMC palliative care · 2024Trial
- Video and In-Person Palliative Care Delivery Challenges before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2022Trial
- Encountering the Other in the Digital Sphere: Emmanuel Levinas' "Ethics of the Face" and the Implications for Virtual Healthcare Ethics in Contemporary Society.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Home-based telework and worker health and well-being across service occupations: A critical interpretive synthesis.SSM - population health · 2026Review
- Employee Perceptions of a Clinical Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Choosing Virtual Versus In-Person Mental Health Crisis Care: A Theoretical Framework for the Decision-Making Process From the Patient's Perspective.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- "It could bring a lot of help to people that aren't getting help right now": A qualitative analysis of the impact of virtual care on access to primary care for people with opioid use disorder.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Telemedicine for NCD Management During and After COVID-19 in India: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Expanding Access to Care: Qualitative Insights from a Nationwide Home-Based Test-to-Treat Program for COVID-19 and Influenza.Research square · 2026Article
- Bayesian Spatial Analysis of Trends and Disparities in Telehealth Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Prescription patterns of inhaler medications from 2017 to 2023: A retrospective study using Ontario administrative healthcare data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Patient Living With Chronic Illness Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration in a Telehealth Context in Primary Care: Protocol for a Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Safeguarding Compassion in Virtual Family Physician Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has driven primary healthcare (PHC) providers to use telehealth as an alternative to traditional face-to-face consultations. Providing telehealth that meets the needs of patients in a pandemic has presented many challenges for PHC providers. The aim of this study was to describe the positive and negative implications of using telehealth in one Canadian (Quebec) and one American (Massachusetts) PHC setting during the COVID-19 pandemic as reported by physicians.
methodsWe conducted 42 individual semi-structured video interviews with physicians in Quebec (N = 20) and Massachusetts (N = 22) in 2020. Topics covered included their practice history, changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the advantages and challenges of telehealth. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis was carried out to identify implications of delivering care via telehealth.
resultsFour key themes were identified, each with positive and negative implications: 1) access for patients; 2) efficiency of care delivery; 3) professional impacts; and 4) relational dimensions of care. For patients' access, positive implications referred to increased availability of services; negative implications involved barriers due to difficulties with access to and use of technologies. Positive implications for efficiency were related to improved follow-up care; negative implications involved difficulties in diagnosing in the absence of direct physical examination and non-verbal cues. For professional impacts, positive implications were related to flexibility (teleworking, more availability for patients) and reimbursement, while negative implications were related to technological limitations experienced by both patients and practitioners. For relational dimensions, positive implications included improved communication, as patients were more at ease at home, and the possibility of gathering information from what could be seen of the patient's environment; negative implications were related to concerns around maintaining the therapeutic relationship and changes in patients' engagement and expectations.
conclusionEnsuring that health services provision meets patients' needs at all times calls for flexibility in care delivery modalities, role shifting to adapt to virtual care, sustained relationships with patients, and interprofessional collaboration. To succeed, these efforts require guidelines and training, as well as careful attention to technological barriers and interpersonal relationship needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.